Evernote makes paperless storage a practical (and affordable) reality

I have spent years inching towards paperlessness.  My working papers have been paperless for over 10 years but the question has been what to do with all those bits of paper everyone else gives me.  Scanning seemed to be the answer but filing in a searchable way was a problem - this is now solved!

Evernote now offers a solution that costs from nothing up to $45 a year (yes free to £30 a year).  At its simplest, it allows scanned images to be flicked through like a paper file but it is much, much more powerful than that.

Key points about the paid for version:

• Invoices (or anything else) can be scanned as pdfs and are then searchable (Evernote uses optical character recognition (OCR) to 'read' douments)
• Electronic papers can be emailed in and are searchable
• Any part (or all) of a web site can be 'clipped' into a notebook - great for evidence of web transactions or for collecting research materials
• Notebooks synchronise with the cloud (and other machines/users if you wish) so it is more secure against loss than paper
• Notes can be accessed and stored by smart phone and Evernote will use OCR on photos of receipts and other documents

I have been using Evernote since about Dec 2010, gradually testing ease of use, reliability and different settings.  Following the purchase of a new scanner in May 2011, I really am ready to stop storing paper. 

In my opinion, with the right help, it should easily be possible to set everything up and learn how to use Evernote in a day.  This could be for a home office or SME office - accommodating up to about 5 ring binders full of paper a month.  

If you would like to investigate this more and see a demonstration, please send me an email at: michael@veale.org.uk

Disclosure: Michael Veale is a director of Smart Accounts Sussex Ltd and neither he nor the company has any financial links to Evernote (except using their software).  Evernote is easy to learn but if you would like to save yourself some time and effort, he would be interested to discuss providing training and set up assistance, for a fee.

One step ahead of the tax man

It can be frustrating to be ahead of the tax man.  Today I am ready to file my Corporation Tax return for year ending 30 April 2011.  All enthusiastic, I logged into HMRC's website to be met by:

Yammer to help reduce internal emails

I am sure you have seen the problem: someone sends an email to 10 people and asks for their ideas.  6 of them read their emails within 24 hours, think they have good ideas (which of course may be duplicated) and 'reply to all'.  The active 6 (plus the person who started) now all reply (CC all) to each other's emails (6x5) + 6 = 36 more emails to everyone and by then, everyone is so confused as to who is talking to whom about what that it grinds to a halt - apart from the 4 of the original 10 who have now got back and are trying to catch up....

The answer to this (unless a meeting is possible) is some kind of forum so that there is one conversation going on, people can see what has been said already and only add if they have something new to say.

There are many possibilities available to do this cheaply (or free) and I have been looking at Yammer for a sailing club committee of about 10 people.

Why use Yammer?

• Its free
• Threaded conversations
• It allows 'Groups' so that users can opt to be involved in some subject discussions but not others
• Conversations can be tagged, to make it easier for people to find relevant information later
• It's secure - default setting is that only people with www.yourdomain.com email addresses can sign up

What problems are we having?
Because the club email addresses that we use are all aliases, if someone sends an email from Yammer and that person replies by email, Yammer does not recognise the user (because it has come from the real email address me@home.com not the alias me@sailingclub.com).  There may be a way around this using 'communities' which allow users from outside www.yourdomain.com (subject to admin approval).

The other problem is not unique to Yammer - some people are change resistant and not keen to use a new system - especially if it is thought to be anything like Facebook.

What's it good for?
Spreading information where 'one to many', 'one to one, CC many', and 'many to many', emails may have been used in the past.

What's it less good for?
One to one messages - suggest using separate group or sticking to email for this to spare other readers from having to read messages to check that they don't need to read them.